Simple Thoughts on KRA Implementation
Conventional and or e-portfolio-link submission
By George P. Lumayag
04.28.2019
KRA documentation is more dynamic and interactive when the school adapts and implements the KRA Electronic Facility wherein teachers shall exclusively offer their links to the raters/master teachers/administrator/s or DepEd supervisor/s.
A supplement to the KRA Conventional Submission is the KRA Electronic Facility which is a less expensive and paperless storage system wherein the school shall have the links of teachers’ e-portfolios that all shared documents can be accessed, can downloaded and can be modified by the raters or admin staff or can be browsed and verified by DepEd supervisors who have the oversight function of KRA implementation.
KRA conventional submission of computer-printed and photocopied documents costs Php 500 ++ especially if the school has no photocopier and if the teacher has no personal printer to be used in printing the scanned eClass Records, scanned Grade Sheets, scanned COTs, Comparative Frequency of Errors in two or three Sections, Daily Lesson Plans (DLPs), Table of Specs (TOS), Rating Sheets, Performance Task Sheets, Activity Sheets, Power Point Slides, pictures of other conventional instructional materials, downloaded published papers, print screen of the webpages as online instructional materials, scanned certificates, and others.
In addition, the teachers shall have to print other documents such as communication to parents, Minutes of the Meeting, PTA Meeting Attendance Sheets, Card Distribution Form, Frequency of Errors with Least Mastered Skills, Anecdotal Record Forms, Home Visitation Forms, etc.
If teachers do value their professional growth, then, they should know on how to operate the 3-in-1 printer to scan the KRA documents and store them in their shared folders from the Google Drive or Sky Drive. Thus, generally speaking, scanning plus storing e-documents would show the technological evolution in school and to the computer-literate teachers.
The author of this opinionated article does not go against the KRA Implementation but rather suggests that if possible, KRA submission should be less expensive and paperless.
04.28.2019
KRA documentation is more dynamic and interactive when the school adapts and implements the KRA Electronic Facility wherein teachers shall exclusively offer their links to the raters/master teachers/administrator/s or DepEd supervisor/s.
A supplement to the KRA Conventional Submission is the KRA Electronic Facility which is a less expensive and paperless storage system wherein the school shall have the links of teachers’ e-portfolios that all shared documents can be accessed, can downloaded and can be modified by the raters or admin staff or can be browsed and verified by DepEd supervisors who have the oversight function of KRA implementation.
KRA conventional submission of computer-printed and photocopied documents costs Php 500 ++ especially if the school has no photocopier and if the teacher has no personal printer to be used in printing the scanned eClass Records, scanned Grade Sheets, scanned COTs, Comparative Frequency of Errors in two or three Sections, Daily Lesson Plans (DLPs), Table of Specs (TOS), Rating Sheets, Performance Task Sheets, Activity Sheets, Power Point Slides, pictures of other conventional instructional materials, downloaded published papers, print screen of the webpages as online instructional materials, scanned certificates, and others.
In addition, the teachers shall have to print other documents such as communication to parents, Minutes of the Meeting, PTA Meeting Attendance Sheets, Card Distribution Form, Frequency of Errors with Least Mastered Skills, Anecdotal Record Forms, Home Visitation Forms, etc.
If teachers do value their professional growth, then, they should know on how to operate the 3-in-1 printer to scan the KRA documents and store them in their shared folders from the Google Drive or Sky Drive. Thus, generally speaking, scanning plus storing e-documents would show the technological evolution in school and to the computer-literate teachers.
The author of this opinionated article does not go against the KRA Implementation but rather suggests that if possible, KRA submission should be less expensive and paperless.